55 facts in comparison MediaTek Helio G90T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G MediaTek Helio G90T Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G Why is MediaTek Helio G90T better than Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G? 1.54x faster downloads? 600MBits/s vs 390MBits/s Uses HMP? Scroll down for more details Why is Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G better than MediaTek Helio G90T? AnTuTu 10. The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios. Snapdragon 685. 343136. Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 +23%. 421109. CPU. Snapdragon 665 vs Helio G80. We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and MediaTek Helio G80 (Mali-G52 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
Performs 6.2x better in floating-point computations. Supports 122% higher memory bandwidth (29.8 against 13.41 GB/s) Shows significantly better (up to 49%) AnTuTu 10 score – 369K vs 247K. 23% higher CPU clock speed (2450 vs 2000 MHz) Has a smaller size transistor (10 versus 12 nm)
8. More threads result in faster performance and better multitasking. Uses big.LITTLE technology. MediaTek Helio G90. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835. Using big.LITTLE technology, a chip can switch between two sets of processor cores to maximize performance and battery life. For example, when playing a game the more powerful cores will be used to
ARMv8.2-A. In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 685 is 21% better than MediaTek Helio G99 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption. GPU and Media.
WFHC.
  • 16n7qdjuvg.pages.dev/134
  • 16n7qdjuvg.pages.dev/103
  • 16n7qdjuvg.pages.dev/397
  • 16n7qdjuvg.pages.dev/249
  • 16n7qdjuvg.pages.dev/353
  • 16n7qdjuvg.pages.dev/235
  • 16n7qdjuvg.pages.dev/349
  • 16n7qdjuvg.pages.dev/142
  • 16n7qdjuvg.pages.dev/9

    • helio g90t vs snapdragon 685